Ten years following the UK stumbled into a hasty public vote that divided the country and triggered turmoil, a advisory comes from across the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.
Authorities and citizens entered unwittingly Brexit and the identical may happen with a referendum on a unified Ireland, initiating upheavals for which no one is prepared.
That conveys the caution from two prominent writers from both sides of the Irish border who have teamed up to examine the advantages and disadvantages of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to form a different country with the Republic of Ireland.
Administrative Structures Unprepared
Fintan O’Toole and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are gravely ill-prepared for a potentially contentious and monumental referendum.
"The key takeaway of Brexit has gone unabsorbed, which is that developments can arise suddenly and can gain traction swiftly," the commentator stated. "It is my view that the institutional structure of our region remains extremely volatile."
Book Publication Intends to Encourage Dialogue
The duo have studied the political, economic and cultural reasons for any governmental shift in a publication, The Case For and Against Unification, published by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.
They hope to provoke discussion on the issue with a series of speaking events that will bring them to Westminster early next month.
"What concerns everyone, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit vote of 2016," commented the analyst.
"We should prevent a national vote on a binary, ambiguous question whose results have not been clarified because then you end up with an highly divided society where people who have lost are resistant to defeat and the people who have won lack clarity quite what it is that they have achieved."
Governmental Mandate
Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland secretary of state should call a public vote on Irish unification if it appears likely that a most voters would approve.
Nationalist parties and other nationalists argue such a time is imminent, and a group named pro-unification advocates has garnered backing, but authorities in Dublin and London and pro-UK factions downplay the prospect, resulting in ambiguity if and when there could be a national vote.
Lack of Serious Debate
Political rhetoric supporting and opposing unification has hidden the absence of substantive discussion, stated the journalist.
"Individuals are often supportive or opposed the concept but the detailed consideration which might go beyond that to achieve it has largely not occurred. A great deal has gone on in academia but very few politicians or campaigners are willing to participate even with the basics. To illustrate, what type of nation would you want? Unitary? Federal?"
Volume's Strategy
In the book, no writer endorses unification or the status quo. They composes two pieces that aim for impartiality in presenting the case for a united Ireland and the rationale against, marshalling economic and social figures, previous instances and structural examples.
Arguments cover identity markers, levies, medical care, pensions, sovereign debt obligations and the danger of loyalist violence. The aim is to enlighten and provoke discussion.
"There is significant curiosity in the topic but there is still lacking a discussion," said O’Toole. "Dialogue implies an acknowledgement of the notion that there might be reasonable perspectives on each side."
Simultaneous Plebiscites
A public vote in Northern Ireland would also trigger one in the Republic of Ireland, where the electorate report they favour unity but reject greater financial contributions or implementing a different emblem to acknowledge pro-UK communities' British culture.
"The Irish government should establish what the proposal from pro-unification movements is aside from just stating: 'We want a united Ireland and we value you'," said O’Toole.
Likelihood of Referendum
The journalist believes a national vote in his lifetime is likely and that it may take place unexpectedly. "It is possible just a reckless or a bad or a incompetent secretary of state who declares: 'Let's just do this and settle the matter.'"
Each of the nationalists and pro-UK supporters have reasonable, valid arguments, he said. "One side will win here and somebody will eventually not succeed but all factions has got important lessons to learn from the alternative arguments."
Appeal for More Extensive Discussion
Westminster must join the debate, said the analyst. "This concerns Britain. It's a UK matter just as much as it is an Irish issue."